news, features, articles and disease information for the sheep industry

All the latest news forSheep | Goats | Llamas | Alpaca


Should Insurance Policies Cover Sheep Attacks?

04 March 2015

IRELAND - Home owners are being reminded to ensure their insurance policy covers any damages arising from attacks by their dog on sheep.

IFA Sheep Chairman John Lynskey said the devastation and trauma experienced by farmers leaves them seriously questioning their future in sheep production.

“Unfortunately, I am taking calls on a frequent basis from sheep farmers around the country who have suffered attacks.

"There are far too many dog owners not taking the responsibility that goes with owning a pet. Dog owners have an obligation to have their dog under control at all times.”

Statistics collated by IFA indicate that the problem of dog attacks on sheep may be in the order of 300 to 400 attacks per annum, with 3,000 to 4,000 sheep injured and killed. He said data on dog attacks gathered by the IFA shows an average of over 11 sheep killed or injured per attack.

The IFA Sheep farmers’ leader warned dog owners that their pets can inflict horrendous damage on a sheep flock in an attack and the owners can be held responsible for the losses involved with serious financial and legal consequences.

He said dog owners are responsible for ensuring that their pets are under control at all times. Based on the annual sheep census, there are 34,304 sheep farmers in Ireland with 2.46m breeding ewes.

John Lynskey said farmers have a right to protect their flock and the law states: It shall be a defence to any action for damages against a person for the shooting of a dog, or to any charge arising out of the shooting of a dog, if the defendant proves that

(a) the dog was shot when it was worrying, or was about to worry, livestock and that there were no other reasonable means of ending or preventing the worrying; or

(b) (i) the dog was a stray dog which was in the vicinity of a place where livestock had been injured or killed, and (ii) the defendant reasonably believed that the dog had been involved in the injury or killing, and (iii) there were no practicable means of seizing the dog or ascertaining to whom it belonged; and

(c) he was the person in charge of the livestock; and

(d) he notified within forty-eight hours the member in charge at the nearest Garda Station to the place where the dog was shot of the incident.

TheSheepSite News Desk

Top image via Shutterstock

Our Sponsors


Seasonal Picks

The Intuitive Farmer: Inspiring Management Success